Rebirth As a Writer In Britain

"No way? Mr. Collison, is what you said true? Someone really reported me for plagiarism?" Kevin couldn't believe his ears.

"Why, you don't know about this? I thought you knew. Yes, someone wrote an article and published it in the "Morning English Literature", and it was the headlines. They said that your recent "Ode to a Nightingale" has Suspected of plagiarism." Collison said.

"Oh, I've been thinking about the new book, so I haven't paid much attention to it. Thank you for letting me know, dear Mr. Collison." Kevin said.

"You're welcome. I believe you, Kevin, I believe you are an honest person. You are not plagiarizing other people's articles as the article says."

"Thank you. I'll look for this article to find out the general situation."

After Kevin and Collison hung up the phone, they checked the news about their plagiarism online. He didn't think he didn't need to look for it. When he opened Twitter, this news had already made the headlines. Not only that, many people also forwarded this tweet to him.

"Genius writer Kevin is a plagiarist"? What's the matter? Could it be that I plagiarized the articles from the previous life on Earth and was discovered.

Kevin thought about it, and then calmed down again, because it was absolutely impossible. Although "Jane Eyre" and "Wuthering Heights" and "Ode to a Nightingale" are all copied from the works of British writers on earth.

But before the plagiarism, Kevin worked hard to check the information and learned from the memory of this reborn person that there are absolutely no such works in this world. Of course, John Keats who wrote "Ode to a Nightingale" does not exist.

Therefore, in a sense, the works written by Kevin—"Jane Eyre", "Wuthering Heights" and "Ode to a Nightingale" are absolutely original works in this parallel world of Britain, and it is impossible for them to be discovered It is plagiarism.

Of course, there will also be a situation, that is, in this parallel world of England, there is a person who is from the earth like Kevin, and also has a good understanding of British works. But this possibility is even lower than the probability of winning a lottery when buying a double-color ball, or even almost zero.

So what's going on here----Kevin was deeply puzzled.

Kevin opened the article that said he plagiarized and read it carefully several times. The general content is that he should not have such a good writing and such a deep understanding of life at such a young age.

In addition, the recently completed "Ode to a Nightingale" is suspected of plagiarizing the work of the Northern Irish writer Charleston Norphy.

When Kevin saw this, he decided to look for the works of the Northern Irish writer Charleston Norphy that the other party said.

After all, the writer the other party mentioned. Kevin didn't know either.

then. Kevin began to search for this writer's works on the Internet, and finally he found a work that the other party said was the same as his "Ode to a Nightingale".

The name of this article is "Thrush Bird". Kevin read it carefully. This article does have some similarities with "Ode to a Nightingale". Especially things. Because the other party wrote about the beautiful singing of the thrush, which is almost the same as the charming singing of the nightingale that I wrote.

But "Thrush Bird" only stays at the level of thrush singing. He just tried to express the beauty of his girlfriend with the beauty of the thrush's song, which means that the writer thinks his girlfriend is as intoxicating as the song of the thrush and the thrush. This is completely different from the idea that "Ode to a Nightingale" wants to convey.

Besides, on writing. The Northern Irish writer Charleston Nolphy is naturally far from "Ode to a Nightingale". So the words are completely different. This does not constitute the definition of plagiarism.

But because Kevin has been too prosperous recently, some people took advantage of it. Want to take the opportunity to hype the topic.

Kevin read it carefully, and felt that strictly speaking, this was not plagiarism at all. Because no one stipulates that there can be no description of the same thing. No one stipulates that others should write thrushes, so they should not write nightingales. Moreover. In terms of words and sentences, this Northern Irish writer is far from "Ode to a Nightingale" by thousands of miles. If it is plagiarism, it has simply improved the level of this writer.

John Keats, the author of Ode to a Nightingale, was born in London in the late 18th century. One of the outstanding English poet writers and a leading member of the Romantic School. He is brilliant, as famous as Shelley and Byron. His poems are considered to perfectly embody the characteristics of Western Romantic poetry, and Keats is also regarded as an outstanding representative of the European Romantic movement.

The poems written by such characters are also said to be plagiarized, and Kevin finds it ridiculous when he thinks about it.

He has already confirmed that he is not a plagiarist, and Kevin doesn't bother to deal with it. Anyone who likes to take the opportunity to hype, just go hype. Anyway, since I am innocent, I am not afraid of what they say.

It wasn't just Kevin who searched for the works of this Northern Irish writer for comparison, but also those who were curious about this matter. People who support and like Kevin also think the same as Kevin, which does not constitute the definition of plagiarism at all.

What is the definition of plagiarism: refers to the act of stealing other people's works as one's own, completely copying other people's works and changing their form or content to a certain extent in the same way of use.

However, Kevin's "Ode to a Nightingale" and the Northern Irish writer's "Thrush" are not related at all except for the beautiful singing of birds, so why plagiarize?

But those who were already jealous and dissatisfied with Kevin didn't think so. It was rare for them to find an opportunity to suppress and belittle Kevin, so naturally they would not let it go.

Zera and Augustine in particular, both tweeted their thoughts on plagiarism.

Zella said on Twitter: "The thing I hate the most in my life is plagiarism. I hope this beautiful country has less plagiarism."

Augustine said directly by name and painting: "There is no doubt that I am very disgusted with Kevin's plagiarism. This is an insult to British literature."

In addition to Zela and Augustine expressing their views, others followed suit.

"I really didn't expect that Kevin is really a plagiarist. I am very disappointed. Alas!"

"I finally thought that a literary genius appeared in the UK, but in the end it turned out to be a plagiarist. This is shameful and dissatisfying. I hope Kevin can apologize to the original creator."

"I just said, how could this young man who is still studying write such good poems and articles, I now deeply suspect that all his works are plagiarized. He is a complete plagiarist By."

"Yes. Everyone searched hard. Maybe "Jane Eyre" and "Wuthering Heights" were plagiarized from others. Otherwise, how could Kevin write books so fast? This has violated the logic of normal people .”

As these people fueled the flames, the matter about Kevin's plagiarism became more and more troublesome. Even David Lee, a famous poetry critic who had just returned home, knew the news.

After seeing the news that Kevin's "Ode to a Nightingale" was plagiarized, he was so surprised that he almost lost his footing.

""Ode to a Nightingale" plagiarized? What's going on?"

Just these few days, David Lee wrote a comment on this poem, so if he said that "Ode to a Nightingale" plagiarized, it would be a slap in the face.

But he has some understanding of both British poetry and foreign poetry. In his memory, there is no poem that is the same as Kevin's "Ode to a Nightingale"? How could it be called plagiarism?

He put down the drink in his hand, and then read the ins and outs of the matter, including the work "Thrush" by the Northern Irish writer.

"What nonsense, they are different except for the beautiful singing of birds. If this is considered plagiarism, then literature should not exist, and poetry should not exist." David Lee said angrily .

After David Lee was angry, he called Kevin again. After all, he was worried that the young man would be overwhelmed by the plagiarized news.

After Kevin saw David Lee's call, he already guessed that the purpose of his call was the same as that of Collison. After all, things about his plagiarism have spread in the literary world.

"Hi! Dear Mr. David Li, do you also want to comfort me?" Kevin said.

"Yes, Kevin, I've known about this for a while. I've also watched the other party's "Thrush". I don't think it's plagiarism at all, so you don't have to worry too much." David Li comforted.

"Thank you for your comfort, don't worry, I didn't take this matter to heart. A wise man once told me, don't care too much about what others think of you, and do what you like to do." Kevin said,

"Well, good job. Seeing your mentality, I feel relieved. Scholars look down on each other. This is the fault of literati all over the world. So some people will always catch something of you, and then take the opportunity to hype it. So, You need a strong heart."

"I have a strong heart all the time, and I deeply believe that every British person should have one. Dear Mr. David Lee, thank you for calling to comfort me. Rest assured, I am really not affected by this matter. Influence."

Since Kevin could read so quickly, David Lee hung up the phone in relief. But he was still very angry about this matter.

So, he felt that he should do something for Kevin. After all, this "Ode to a Nightingale" has been written by myself. He didn't want anyone to taint the perfection of the poem.

But David Li Yue tried to do this, but the result was the opposite. Because the logic of most people is: David Lee wrote a review for "Ode to a Nightingale", so he will naturally come out and say good things about "Ode to a Nightingale". (To be continued.) Enable new URL