Rewrite the Technological Landscape

The generation difference between software and hardware is leading, and the era of global emerging technology standards is beginning. The two-day conference has made the world understand some things more clearly. For the Dafeng Group and the global technological landscape, everyone has a firmer new vision. view.

At the same time, everyone began to look forward to what the content of the third question of the conference would be. The answer was that Dafeng Group focused on global cooperation projects for this day.

On the morning of the third day, the conference showcased the fruitful achievements of global technology companies through cooperation, and proved to the public that cooperation can indeed achieve a win-win situation with the facts before our eyes.

In the afternoon, the conference began to mention a brand new concept.

Many people now know that large-scale scientific and technological projects that cooperate among countries are called big science and technology. What these big science and technology have in common is that the technology is very difficult and requires the joint efforts of all countries to complete.

And now there is another concept, an international inter-enterprise cooperation project repeatedly promoted by Dafeng Group, called Business Big Technology.

The commonality of commercial big technology and big technology is that these technologies are very difficult and require a lot of resources and capital to complete.

The biggest difference between commercial big technology and big technology is that these cooperation projects have a clear commercial purpose, which is a win-win cooperation between enterprises, and the ultimate goal is to help enterprises obtain higher benefits.

Regardless of whether it is the traditional international corporate cooperation projects in the morning or the commercial big technologies in the afternoon, these cooperations are clearly revealing a detail on the basis of demonstrating the technology itself: "the combination of strength and weakness".

For a long time, things like big science and technology have been a strong alliance, a game between big countries and big countries. Relatively backward countries have to pay a huge price to participate in it, and in many cases, even if they are willing to pay a high price, they will not He won't play with you, or even treat you like a monkey.

However, commercial big technology does not follow this rule at all. As long as relatively weak companies can provide capital, talent reserves, basic R\u0026D results that meet the rules, and follow up the R\u0026D cycle of the project, they will have the opportunity to enter the cooperation project.

The threshold of commercial big technology is these clear standards. Even if your money is borrowed, even if your talents are all patchwork, as long as you have the ability to get it done, you can follow the project rules and follow along. .

This is to provide an international platform for those relatively backward enterprises that are determined, self-motivated, and capable of breaking the boat to sink their boats to improve their technological level.

Of course, if you are so backward that you can’t figure out the threshold by relying on borrowing, then you can only be excluded. After all, commercial technology is not charity.

But it has changed some traditions, because in the past, the more determined and self-motivated relatively backward enterprises and relatively backward countries, the more they would be targeted by the powerful, because the last thing those powerful enterprises and countries want is With the development of such a company and country, I wish you could die quickly.

Following this philosophy, the next demonstration on the conference floor is the fairness of scarce cutting-edge equipment.

For example, Thailand has been supporting a local chip company with extremely high policy and capital strength in the past two years. Their current goal is to become one of the companies in the world that can handle 5nm processor foundry, so they purchased a 5nm lithography machine from Dafeng Group .

5nm lithography machines are currently scarce equipment, and even leading companies need to line up to buy them, but even so, Gale Group has not imposed any restrictions on Thai companies. The delivery time is fair and just, giving Thai companies the opportunity they deserve.

This was unimaginable in the past, because equipment with such cutting-edge needs has always been a matter of business transactions between giant companies. Emerging companies want to purchase such equipment? Don't even think about it, it's a face for you to be able to provide you with equipment that is a generation behind.

Normally, only two generations of equipment are sold to emerging companies, especially those in developing countries. This restriction is used to protect the absolute advantages of giant companies in developed countries.

Gale Group once again broke the monopoly rules of developed countries and giant companies on the supply side of cutting-edge equipment, and brought a new rule and a new game to the world.

On the evening of the third day of the conference, this year's Gale Global Developers Conference was coming to an end, Meng Qian appeared on the main stage again, and said directly at the beginning, "The Wassenaar Agreement is the shame of contemporary human development!"

When Meng Qian said this, his face was serious and his eyes were sharp, so that everyone didn't know whether to applaud or not, and the scene fell into absolute silence.

Meng Qian continued on the stage, "Behind the artificial opposition, it often means independence, but the independence I am talking about is not the independence of the commendatory word, but the independence of loneliness.

A few days ago, I took my son to a summer camp about protecting glaciers. In that summer camp, there were more than 1,000 children under the age of 16 from more than 80 countries around the world.

Everyone has different skin colors, different languages, and different cultures, but I saw their harmony and happiness together, and their concerted efforts when discussing countermeasures for the same goal and to protect glaciers.

Everyone can simply imagine a picture. Do you hope that one day you meet a few friends from overseas in a hotel, and you can naturally come forward and say, "Hey buddies, do you want to have a drink together, and then share your life happily?"

Or do I hope that when I meet a few overseas friends in the hotel in the future, the first reaction in my mind is that these people are from a certain country and are our enemies. We must not be friends with them, or even kill them?

Which scene do you like better?

Why, I don't understand why we still have to engage in the Cold War mentality in 2019. Is it because we are living in the previous era and cannot get out, or are we so incompetent that we are afraid to accept any challenges?

At least for me, I cannot accept the Cold War mentality of 2019, the unilateralism of 2019, and the existence of such anti-human things as the Walsen Agreement in 2019.

Because when I saw my son and his new friends from all over the world at the summer camp, I saw a beautiful world in the new era in the future.

I don't hope that when my child grows up in a few years, he will have to give up the good things he once had because of the still prevailing Cold War mentality and unilateralism.

I don't even hope that the future world will continue the stupid and absurd history of mankind, because I believe that the peaceful development of mankind is not a luxury, because I believe that the Cold War mentality is a barbaric and backward thing, which should have been recognized long ago. Abandoned dross.

But as an entrepreneur, my ability is limited. I can only call for new globalization over and over again. Judging from the results, we have received a lot of positive and positive feedback.

And in this process, I have seen more and more people joining our camp. I believe that my persistence will definitely become our persistence and everyone's persistence. "

Meng Qian's closing speech of the conference left an open ending without any substantive conclusion.

However, after the conference ended, entrepreneurs from many countries began to express their opinions. Whether it was companies from developed countries such as Germany and France, or companies from developing countries in Southeast Asia and Africa, they all wrote down their views on the new global economy on Fengxin, Twitter and other platforms. recognition and expectations of globalization, as well as violent protests against the Cold War mentality and unilateralism.

Public opinion in the global technology business circle is developing in one direction and is beginning to influence more people.